Contact Information:
Assistant Editor
Mary K. Aaby

E-mail: RFM@kent.edu
Telephone: 330.672.2432
Fax: 330.672.9806

Mail:
RFM
College of Business Administration
Kent State University
P.O. Box 5190
Kent, Ohio 44242-0001



Call for Papers
20th Annual APFRS

Deadline Nov 1, 2009
  More Information


In cooperation with
IFM LOGO

Review of Futures Markets

Volume 14 | Issue 4 | Article 2

<< Previous Article | Next Article >>
Back To: Table of Contents

Trading on the Floor after Sweeping the Book
Vassilis Polimenis (G12)

The recent emergence of hybrid markets that combine both automated as well as manual trading venues is a phenomenon not yet completely understood by academia or the industry. Are hybrid markets more efficient than stand-alone trading floors? Are hybrid markets needed when there is a fast market in place? Do hybrid markets generate incremental trading flow, or do they just re-distribute the flow between the two different venues? In a hybrid market, the fast electronic component provides immediate and deterministic access to liquidity, while the slow trading floor provides a risky execution. We study the competition between the two types of trading venues in a hybrid arrangement. We show that the critical issue that determines the ability of a trading floor to compete for order flow is whether sweeps in the electronic market take place at progressive price points or at the single clean-up price. When the fast market is of the clean-up type, the hybrid market generates more flow than any of its stand-alone components.